ext_91830 ([identity profile] foudebassan.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] foudebassan 2007-04-11 09:59 am (UTC)

I don't know. At school, Villon is the limit, anyone after him is fair game in exams, competitions etc. and before him it's considered to be specialised knowledge. The difference in language between him and medieval poets isn't that big, and they're all intelligible to modern eyes if said eyes are trained enough (we've had the Académie Française since Richelieu, meaning that written French doesn't evolve as quickly as other languages, only slang and dialects change with every other generation). I think arbitrarily choosing Villon is more of an ideological choice, as in making the beginnings of French coincide with the Renaissance.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting